ai
Microsoft reports AI is more expensive than paying human employees
The latest news from Microsoft has sent shockwaves through the industry.
The editorial desk behind AI Practitioner — applied AI for product and engineering teams. We write about LLMs in production, agent design, evaluation, cost, and shipping AI that works, with sources for every claim.
ai
The latest news from Microsoft has sent shockwaves through the industry.
ai
It's becoming increasingly evident that memory has become a significant component of AI chip costs.
ai
It's essential to examine the current state of its profitability. The question of whether AI is profitable yet has been a topic of discussion among industry experts,…
ai
Recent developments have brought attention to MAI-Code-1-Flash. The introduction of this technology has been making waves, with discussions and announcements popping…
ai
It's becoming increasingly evident that AI has a multiplying effect on existing technical skills.
ai
Recent developments at Stanford University's CS336 course are at the forefront of this change.
ai
The gap between a compelling AI demo and a successful production pilot is one of the most demoralizing experiences in applied AI. The demo worked on every example you showed. The pilot ran for six weeks and users reported that the feature was unreliable, slow, and sometimes wrong in embarrassing
ai
AI products fail in ways that traditional software products do not. A bug in a CRUD application either works or throws an error. An AI feature can produce plausible-looking wrong answers with high confidence, behave differently on Tuesday than it did on Monday without any code change, and fail in
ai
Running a single LLM call is simple to debug: you have an input, a prompt, and an output. Running an agent that orchestrates multiple LLM calls, tool invocations, and conditional branches is a different operational category. When an agent produces a wrong answer or gets stuck in a loop, you
ai
The fine-tuning versus RAG debate is mostly a false binary. In practice, the right architecture depends on three variables specific to your use case: the nature of the knowledge your application requires, your latency tolerance, and how frequently that knowledge changes. Getting this wrong is expensive. Fine-tuning a large model
ai
Perplexity is a terrible proxy for production usefulness. A model with excellent perplexity on a held-out text corpus can still produce confidently wrong answers, miss edge cases in your specific domain, or fail at the structured output requirements your application depends on. Teams that select models by benchmark performance and
ai
The default AI content pipeline assumption is that you need cloud API access to do anything useful. That assumption is wrong, and increasingly expensive to maintain as you scale content volume. A local LLM running on commodity hardware, combined with n8n for orchestration, handles the majority of structured content automation
We use a privacy-friendly analytics cookie to understand which articles are useful. It is optional and never shared with advertisers. Cookie Policy